»Matrix Furniture!«

Could be the possibility of a post-mortem deformation and body dissolution that the intestine package could be displaced following the contraction of the esophagus and the diafragma?, I saw similar things in died animals in desert zones.

Another question is: could be possible that, because the low PH of the carnivore´s gastric chloridre acid, the rests of their "children" were dissolved at all? ( crocodile´s gastric juices could "melt" a spear point!)

Also there´s a question about one big carnivore I recently have read news about. Did the paleontologists found finally the rest of the Carcharodontosaur´s bones? The latest bones were found in North Africa, but there weren´t news from this puppet since the year 2001, if I´m not wrong.

Angel [MIFUNE] wrote:

Could be the possibility of a post-mortem deformation and body dissolution that the intestine package could be displaced following the contraction of the esophagus and the diafragma?, I saw similar things in died animals in desert zones. Another question is: could be possible that, because the low PH of the carnivore´s gastric chloridre acid, the rests of their "children" were dissolved at all? ( crocodile´s gastric juices could "melt" a spear point!)

Then why are these two Coelophysis the only two in which the juveniles were found? And why the two specimens side by side, both at the same stage of "digestion"? I admit your scenario is possible, but the odds are against it.
Also, do you remember what specimen you saw similar things in? I would like to see that!

Angel[MIFUNE] wrote:

Also there´s a question about one big carnivore I recently have read news about. Did the paleontologists found finally the rest of the Carcharodontosaur´s bones? The latest bones were found in North Africa, but there weren´t news from this puppet since the year 2001, if I´m not wrong.

They do that a lot. They want to take their time and get a pretty painting made of the species to "confirm" their theories.
According to this site:

But, I´m sure that´s a cranium exposed in some museum of the EEUU!, I saw the photos and even a X-Ray scheme where the craneal cavity was exposed!

Oh, sure you mean that it´s still in classification process, no?

If the largest theropod ever discovered had recently been described.
I don't follow the paleontologists' big flashy press conferences where they announce something has been discovered, before scientifically describing it.
See, Angel, big-time paleontologists are mountebanks, not scientists. They are hooked on the limelight.
I look in my father's issue of the journal Science every week. And if I don't see it in the news section there, but I do see it on Yahoo, I ignore it. Because Yahoo does not require peer review.

looks_comfortable wrote:

Asslicker wrote: SPANISH-----EUROPEAN person that lives in a country named SPAIN SPANIARD-----Person that comes from countries of South America that speak Spanish Span·iard n. A native or inhabitant of Spain.

Individuals from South (Latin) America are not called "Spaniard" either, but "Latin," 'Latino," "Latin American," "South American," "Hispanic," or one of many other less PC qualifiers.

PS - in the USA, we are taught that there are 7 continents, not 6. America is split into North America and South America. Mexico is part of North America, but is grouped into Latin America because Mexicans are Spanish speaking.

Angel [MIFUNE] wrote:

want to see more of your work.

I´ve a printed version of your work into my own library.

I liked so much the las essay.

BTW. Are you Paleontologist?

Angel [MIFUNE] wrote:

I´ve a printed version of your work into my own library. I liked so much the las essay. BTW. Are you Paleontologist?

Thanks, Angel...no, I'm not a paleontologist, because I don't have the resources to test my ideas empirically. I hope now that dinosaur soft-tissue has been discovered that paleontologists will be able to justify some of these thoughts on a molecular basis.
I prefer the term "theoretician."

You mean 4 level tissue instead a plaque surface over an adipous substract directly attached to the muscles fibrous coberture?. Something similar to human-mammal skin?

It´s a good approach to the theories of a most evolutionated theropod families.

Any species associated with those characteristics?

That any theropod skin had been discovered. I was referring to the recent discovery of internal soft tissue in T. Rex.
Some of the words in your post are not present in English, so I am having trouble understanding your question...
Can you clarify?

I was trying to make "english" some words in spanish.

I was talking of soft tissue as the skin tissue. In dinosaurs , the external hard tissue is attached to a FAT tissue (don´t know the exact word in english) and this is over a very basic epitelium (I know this word exists), that is over a fibrous tissue that covers the muscles that I don´t know its exact name in english (in spanish or in greek, its original name is called APONEUROSIS)...

I can´t find my dictionary....

Angel [MIFUNE] wrote:

I was trying to make "english" some words in spanish. I was talking of soft tissue as the skin tissue. In dinosaurs , the external hard tissue is attached to a FAT tissue (don´t know the exact word in english) and this is over a very basic epitelium (I know this word exists), that is over a fibrous tissue that covers the muscles that...

The word you are looking for concerning fat is "adipose".

I can´t remember well where I´ve read the information about Dinosaur´s skin strucure. Aniway, take a look at some books of reptile anathomy. You must consider that, the same as sharks, that didn´t evolve a lot since the last 60 million years, crocodiles and varanus (Komodo Dragon) had this kind of skin structure, so, It´s very possible that ( as I read...my bad memory, sorry) the same structure could be found in dinosaur´s skin. Problably there were some immprovements, like some sort of pheromone structures for territory marking, or even skin colour changing, but this last is one of my oppinions.

<----me, talking about dinosaurs at 2:34 am

Read this!

After the discovering of ARCHAEOPTERIX in Las Hoyas , Cuenca (SPAIN) 120 million years aged, recently it was discovered the Microraptor Gui, 128 million years old!, it has four wings ( 2 about 90 similar to actual birds in the scapular pelvis , and other 2 that are a modification of the calcaneum bone plus the more lenght of the tibial bone).

Oh...nice X history with tozi. But, a bit soft...and, for what I´ve readed, tozi only cares about your apparently obsession with her!, then the rest of the history doesen´t seem to affect her...so...keep writing, but write Dino´s essays, I want to compile them in a book (hope you haven´t put to them a damned Copyright)

Please feel free to disseminate these essays as you wish, Angel.
Muchas Gracias!

De nada, tio. (in SPANIARD )

Not at all, man. (in English)



===O: ===O: ===O:

Here they are, by popular demand!

I want more!, what about an essay about the hunting and social behaviour of dromaeosaurs?, even when it was sci-fi as we could read in JP and its sequel The lost World, there´s some good articles that affirm that raptors has more than a complex comunication system, a mix between sound and body signals.

"Your" book gets fatty.

PS: want to see more of your images.