[Matrix Reloaded]
Seraph (after fighting with Neo): "I had to be sure."
Neo: "Of what?"
Seraph: "That you are The One."
Neo: "You could've just asked."
 

Username:

  
Password:

  
Auto-login on each visit
  

  
Not a user yet? Register in 20 seconds!

»Who's Choice? (how do I remove this topic?)«


Forum:
Ask your Matrix questions here

 

strongenoughtobreak

Who's Choice? (how do I remove this topic?)  

Reply with quote


I have just started to post
Posts: 2
View user's profile

I have put this topic in the correct forum under 'more theories' under the topic name CHOICE CODE THEORY Please tell me how I can delete this topic from 'questions' because it's really not a question.

-------------------------------------------------------------
My theory is based apon a beleif that choice was in referance to only a human trait without understanding that programs are capable of choice as well. We find out that such things exist in the programs that exist in humans, such as love.
For example; The love between Sati and her parent programs. Neo seemed suprised that programs could love, as im sure we were all suprised.

Okay, lets start with what we actually know, there are only 2 explained programed versions of the matrix mentioned. One is perfect that fails, and the other isnt perfect that the movies are based.
We never actually know how many different versions there are, for all we know there were only two main major versions and the rest may be variations of the same simulation run with small changes.

the first matrix was perfect in the programming sense but not perfect for humans. So the architect works alittle, consults with the oracle to tap into the human psyche on it, and finally he aims for the pinnacle of human civilization for perfection within the system. He simulates the world based apon the year (answer anyone? 1999 I believe). This version proved to be perfect for humans, Only now...the programs started to reject the system because it is not perfect in the programmed sense. It gave the programs feelings like suffering, which did not exist in the perfect version.

With this you have marovingian and the exiles as to where they came from probably the failed simulations of the matrix. So in turn the system defies itself with the current unperfect version. The programs that are deleted can either choose to return to the source, or exile into the matrix. The problem is choice, inside each program, they are given a choice that goes to the source, a choice to reject deletion.

Zion.
If the architect would have never allowed zion to restart, as u know he talks about how it's been destroyed however many times before, no human would ever be freed.

Since we know that Zion is destroyed and restarted by the machines several times, you could say that Zion is created by the machines and not by humans in the real world. Humans don't genuinely exist within the real world. The ones without plugs and ports riddled all over their bodies are probably just simply put...The genetic decendants of podborns. They are put there to distribute the one.

Lets look at the one.

The one is given code that allows him to change the matrix as he sees fit. Not to mention this code is also needed to reload the matrix. So I suspect this code was put there by the architect. Why you may ask? To bring the code that allows choice to reject deletion within the programs. When, u might ask? When the architect found the one freed human that would not run, but fight the system.
'Alitle advice, if you see an agent, you run. Run your ass off.' -Cypher.

The ability to live instead of die once killed as seen in the first movie grasps this idea to start. See...Agent smith kills neo, and when neo decides not to die, he gets up.
'That's Impossible.' -Agent Smith (The Matrix).
Thus a program recognizing something that doesnt compute as it should inside the system lies a flaw, an inperfection within the system.
Then agent smith is destroyed, actually destroyed by neo. He, like all other obsolete programs, must then return to the source and face deletion. In which he doesnt. Why is this?

'I watched you die, Mr. Anderson. With a certain satisfaction...' - Agent Smith (Reloaded)

During the same conversation with neo, in reloaded, Smith also says something like 'I dont actually know how it happened, something of you copied onto me'.
I think this means the code. The architect caught the first program in 'this version of the matrix' that rejects the system. Giving smith the code he gives him the ability to make changes within the matrix.
In order to ballance the equation, you must delete the code that allows the programs to choose to not be deleted and bring it to the source. This is done through neo when agent smith copies himself over every program inside the matrix and then over neo and neo dies, bringing the code of the one as well as the code that alows choice built into every program to the source. Reloading the matrix and ballancing the equation. Deleting the choice to reject deletion.

Let me know what you think of this theory.

Reply to topic



Right now you are in a Matrix forum called
"Ask your Matrix questions here"
Page 1 of 1

Click here to see all topics of this forum
Click here to see all other Matrix forums hosted by matrix-explained.com

 


Click here for more options
V
V

Search

View unanswered posts

Log in to check your private messages

Click here to see, who is online

Most users ever online was 443 on 06.Nov.2003 10:03

Submit your site!

Go voting!

Edit your data

Jump to:  
Memberlist
Usergroups
FAQ
The time now is 26.May.2012 01:36
All times are GMT + 2 Hours

Powered by p h p B.B. © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group