
Experienced poster
Posts: 115
|
Feral Boy wrote: | Surprised wrote: | | What did you think of my idea that Ouroboros might have existed in actual human history, being the company that spawned the very first AI of machines? We have "MetaCortex", or "EvolvedBrain" (how machines see themselves in comparison to humans). Ouroboros is symbolic of cycles specifically in the way that death leads to life. |
You might need to explain this a bit further, because I don't yet understand what you're saying. |
Sorry, this was definitely a bit vague. Think back to human history before the Matrix came about. Machines obviously know about all of human history just from human records alone (not to mention machines themselves lived in the end of human history). Perhaps there were really companies called Metacortex and Ouroboros that produced the first AI/robots which led to the machines and eventually the Matrix. If that were the case, it would make even more sense that the Merovingian's disguise in the Matrix is the president of the company that founded the machines. In a world full of disgusting and irrational humans, this company would probably feel most like "home", representing the closest he can get to the world of machines. Not to mention the additional status he'd gain in the eyes of exiles who are also programs/machines - in their eyes, he'd be the most powerful human in the Matrix because he represents the human heading the corporation that eventually leads to the enslavement of the human race.
Feral Boy wrote: | | So I suppose for the sake of keeping the Architect's statements as truthful as possible, those "extra" versions could have taken place AFTER the Oracle took over. |
What will be interesting is to hopefully find out which of these unknown versions came before or after the other.
Feral Boy wrote: | | Holy crap! That makes such total sense! The Merovingian is doing his job, then the Oracle comes along with her Sight and has a better idea of how things should be run. Management hires her and fires the Merovingian. The Merovingian swears revenge and seeks to possess the thing which he believes made the Oracle better than him--her eyes. Brilliant stuff, man! And if that's true, then the first mention of the Merovingian by the Oracle is a very subtle hint that she's his replacement because she had just finished talking about programs getting scheduled for deletion when a better program comes along. See, this is why I wanted people in here talking about stuff! |
Thanks, Feral. And this is also why I told you a long time ago to stay in touch. You and I think very much alike, and the goals of our thought processes are very similar. You definitely need to stick around.
Intell wrote: | Surprised wrote: | | the Merovingian calls Seraph his little Judas. Clearly Seraph used to protect the Merovingian. Before the Oracle came along, the Merovingian "mattered most" (I would argue this is another example of programs not able to deny purpose - Seraph's original purpose is to "protect that which matters most"). The Merovingian wouldn't have much right to use that "Judas" label (not to mention "Prodigal Son") for Seraph if the cause of this betrayal were actually the Merovingian's retirement. The Merovingian, after all, is the one who believes solely in causality - he'd have to apply his own logic and say that Seraph's betrayal is merely the logical effect of the Merovingian's cause. |
Likewise, would it be kinda funny for Merv to consider Seraph a traitor for simply following his "programming" if it were mere Cauality behind it. |
Actually, I don't think so. Even Deus ex Machina demonstrates emotion (pride/anger) when there is no place for it. DEM knows Neo is right (that it can't stop Smith without Neo), but still it doesn't want to give in. Neo's correct assertion pisses DEM off. But DEM is compelled to give in. It must, because Neo is right. No matter how machines choose to feel about the truth, machines cannot deny truth any more than they can deny their original purpose. Truth is just as much a part of their programming as purpose is.
Smith was compelled to disobey. But this compelling feeling was rational, for one key reason: he can still fight anomalies. If a bird goes extinct, the program that governed that bird would probably choose deletion because it has no way to fulfill its purpose anymore. But I speculate that every program which is still capable of fulfilling its designed purpose chooses deletion. I base this speculation on the Oracle's statement that "most" programs choose deletion.
Intell wrote: | Surprised wrote: | | even refers to it as his "job". Why would he even use that word "job" if it were something he were merely choosing to do that he wasn't even created for? |
You can choose your job. Or you can "find another" one like Rhineheart told Neo he might have to do (which he did ) But Merv didn't use the word anyway. |
You are right that the Merovingian didn't use the word "job" (I remembered incorrectly) - instead he uses "business". But the point was, the Merovingian took offense that he was asked if he knows something that he so obviously should know. Why does the Merovingian expect his knowledge of the matter to be so plainly obvious? Because he was designed with a purpose that allows him to. It would be like someone asking the IRS, "Are you aware of how much in taxes you've collected this year to date?" Of course they do, that's the whole purpose for the existence of the IRS. What a silly, utterly stupid question to ask them.
You argue that programs can find another job. I never said they couldn't. I just said they cannot quit their original job if the job is still available to do. Yes, many exiles are doing multiple jobs. Neo and Rhineheart is one thing - they are humans. Neo does a lot more than quit his job. But I can't think of any programs where we know for sure that they are no longer fulfilling their original purpose. Even the Oracle continues to study the human psyche even though (under my theory that Feral liked) she was scheduled to take over the Merovingian's job of information trafficking.
You used the Neo-Rhineheart conversation to parallel programs not doing their job - in my opinion this misses one of the biggest points of the entire trilogy. I use the conversation to parallel Neo not doing his job of the One in M2. Neo is the only "machine" with purpose that is actually not a machine - Neo is human, and therefore he is the only "machine" that can deny purpose! That's the whole point of Neo's choice for the left door. If Neo were an actual machine, he absolutely could not choose to deny his greatest purpose, namely to temporarily cancel out the systemic anomaly.
Intell wrote: | Surprised wrote: | | I mean, consider the fact that the Architect HAS to be aware that Mobil Ave. exists. The Architect allows this whole "Merovingian controls exiles" thing to happen. |
That may be well beyond the Architect's sphere of influence. He made the matrix and oversees its operation. |
True, I guess the important thing is that the Architect not only knows Mobil Ave. exists, he uses it for a place to dump programs that choose exile. There would probably be a different system in place if it weren't for the Merovingian, but the Architect is making a virtue of necessity.[/i]
|