[Matrix Revolutions]
Morpheus: "I don't know what he can do to save us, but I do know that as long as there is a single breath in his body he'll never give up..and neither can we."
 

Username:

  
Password:

  
Auto-login on each visit
  

  
Not a user yet? Register in 20 seconds!

»How old is the matrix we saw?«


Forum:
Ask your Matrix questions here

 

Lazarus

How old is the matrix we saw?  

Reply with quote


More experienced poster
Posts: 27
View user's profile

This has been bugging me for a bit, this simple question of how old was the matrix that we saw in the first-last movie?

This question also leads to... how did the 5th Neo die?


Think of it this way... at most Mr. Anderson is 25-30.

-If that is so then how do the people in the pods get transfered that are much older?
-How did the One before the current die?
-If the previous One did not die but chose the Architects plan then why are there old people?

Just some things that could stir up some theories... i have my own... but i preffer to hear yours.

War solves all problems: no man, no problem. - Joseph Stalin.
Neo1

Re: How old is the matrix we saw?  

Reply with quote


Spent much time here, parents wondering
Posts: 1129
Location: The Matrix
View user's profile

Lazarus wrote:

This has been bugging me for a bit, this simple question of how old was the matrix that we saw in the first-last movie?


a few of us here have come to the conclusion that each cycle of the matrix lasts 100 years. So in M1 it would becoming close to the end of the 600th year.

Lazarus wrote:

This question also leads to... how did the 5th Neo die?


Because that neo has the anomly code in the 6th version this leads me to believe that the 5th one, chose the right door and returned tot eh source.

Lazarus wrote:

Think of it this way... at most Mr. Anderson is 25-30.


That would be about right, but you have to remember that the anomly code would have been inserted when he was a child.

Lazarus wrote:

-If that is so then how do the people in the pods get transfered that are much older?


the people in the pods while age normally, and as this happens there RSI changes in the matrix.

Lazarus wrote:

-How did the One before the current die?


I've already answered this one - see earlier answer

Lazarus wrote:

-If the previous One did not die but chose the Architects plan then why are there old people?


Because when a one return back to the source, he can only pick a certain amount of people, these people will populate the city of zion, so in saying that he would only choose young health people. that is why there are old people in the matrix.

"Too know the truth, you must first look past the lie."
Lazarus

  

Reply with quote


More experienced poster
Posts: 27
View user's profile

Even if he chose... 5-6 old people it wouldn't explain the large number in the movies

Deeindamatrix

Re: How old is the matrix we saw?  

Reply with quote


So many posts, I am a Warner Brother
Posts: 1487
Location: indamatrix
View user's profile

Quote:

Even if he chose... 5-6 old people it wouldn't explain the large number in the movies


Just an idea, what is to say 5th intergral A. didnt choose people who were pregnant with twins, triplets etc. That would speed up the process, not by much but would kick in later.

Or mabye, going against my own opinion, the architect lied they could free up to 50 or something like that, that meaning the 23 people was just an ilusion.

Sign it petitiononline.com...

c-r-a-p.piczo.com...
CaptPostMod

Re: How old is the matrix we saw?  

Reply with quote


What would the forum be without me?
Posts: 1798
Location: Right Here
View user's profile

Neo1 wrote:

a few of us here have come to the conclusion that each cycle of the matrix lasts 100 years. So in M1 it would becoming close to the end of the 600th year.


If the cycles of the Matrix are 100 years or so, then the entire timeline since the machines were victorious would be closer to a millenium. There would be the first paradise failed Matrix (which may have lasted less than a hundred years, but still existed for a period of time). Then possibly the Dark Age re-write of the Matrix that many of us accept (the one that Merv's vampires come from) which lacked the Oracle's system of control through free-will. Then the first 1999 Matrix with the Oracle's system of control in place.

Now we're at around 200-300 years from the victory of the machines. This is when the cycles of the One begin. There's some debate on whether or not the first integral anamoly followed the system of control known as "The Path of the One" or was free of it. I'm in the camp that feels that the Architect does not count the first 1999 Matrix in his versions. He says he counts the time between the emergence of each anamoly. This would mean that he begins counting after the emergence of the first anamoly (who was not controlled by the prophecy of the One and so was not a The One). Which means there have been 7 versions of the 1999 Matrix, and 6 versions featuring the Path of the One system of control.

So if there was a paradise Matrix that lasted a few years before it crashed, followed by a Dark Age Matrix which lasted a hundred years (maybe), followed by the first free-will Matrix which lasted a hundred years (again maybe), followed by the six cyclic One Matrixes (which each lasted a hundred years)... then the year is closer to 2999-3099.

Wow, that was a mouthful Smile

Many of Matrix-Explained's members have moved. Check us out at--matrixfans2007.informe.com...
Lazarus

Re: How old is the matrix we saw?  

Reply with quote


More experienced poster
Posts: 27
View user's profile

Deeindamatrix wrote:

Quote:

Even if he chose... 5-6 old people it wouldn't explain the large number in the movies


Just an idea, what is to say 5th intergral A. didnt choose people who were pregnant with twins, triplets etc. That would speed up the process, not by much but would kick in later.

Or mabye, going against my own opinion, the architect lied they could free up to 50 or something like that, that meaning the 23 people was just an ilusion.



The architect doesn't lie Razz... he's not human lol

Deeindamatrix

  

Reply with quote


So many posts, I am a Warner Brother
Posts: 1487
Location: indamatrix
View user's profile

I agree but some people believe he lied

CaptPostMod

  

Reply with quote


What would the forum be without me?
Posts: 1798
Location: Right Here
View user's profile

Here we go again! Wink

There's another thread for this whole Architect lying idea-

matrix-explained.com...

Deeindamatrix

  

Reply with quote


So many posts, I am a Warner Brother
Posts: 1487
Location: indamatrix
View user's profile

were not argueing i agree i was just think from another point of view

Neo1

Re: How old is the matrix we saw?  

Reply with quote


Spent much time here, parents wondering
Posts: 1129
Location: The Matrix
View user's profile

CaptPostMod wrote:

Neo1 wrote:

a few of us here have come to the conclusion that each cycle of the matrix lasts 100 years. So in M1 it would becoming close to the end of the 600th year.


If the cycles of the Matrix are 100 years or so, then the entire timeline since the machines were victorious would be closer to a millenium. There would be the first paradise failed Matrix (which may have lasted less than a hundred years, but still existed for a period of time). Then possibly the Dark Age re-write of the Matrix that many of us accept (the one that Merv's vampires come from) which lacked the Oracle's system of control through free-will. Then the first 1999 Matrix with the Oracle's system of control in place.

Now we're at around 200-300 years from the victory of the machines. This is when the cycles of the One begin. There's some debate on whether or not the first integral anamoly followed the system of control known as "The Path of the One" or was free of it. I'm in the camp that feels that the Architect does not count the first 1999 Matrix in his versions. He says he counts the time between the emergence of each anamoly. This would mean that he begins counting after the emergence of the first anamoly (who was not controlled by the prophecy of the One and so was not a The One). Which means there have been 7 versions of the 1999 Matrix, and 6 versions featuring the Path of the One system of control.

So if there was a paradise Matrix that lasted a few years before it crashed, followed by a Dark Age Matrix which lasted a hundred years (maybe), followed by the first free-will Matrix which lasted a hundred years (again maybe), followed by the six cyclic One Matrixes (which each lasted a hundred years)... then the year is closer to 2999-3099.

Wow, that was a mouthful Smile


you see it can work out. based on the 100 year principle

Reply to topic



Right now you are in a Matrix forum called
"Ask your Matrix questions here"
Page 1 of 1

Click here to see all topics of this forum
Click here to see all other Matrix forums hosted by matrix-explained.com

 


Click here for more options
V
V

Search

View unanswered posts

Log in to check your private messages

Click here to see, who is online

Most users ever online was 443 on 06.Nov.2003 10:03

Submit your site!

Go voting!

Edit your data

Jump to:  
Memberlist
Usergroups
FAQ
The time now is 25.May.2012 21:03
All times are GMT + 2 Hours

Powered by p h p B.B. © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group