[Matrix Reloaded]
Merovingian (to the pale Twins): "All right. All right. Let us find out where this goes. You two, get the Keymaker."
 

Username:

  
Password:

  
Auto-login on each visit
  

  
Not a user yet? Register in 20 seconds!

»Philosophy in Science Fiction«


Forum:
Matrix Chit Chat & Fun

 

allone

Philosophy in Science Fiction  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

I will be taking this course at my university this semester, they haven't offered it before (to my understanding). I spoke with the prof for just a minute and he seems very excited about the course, as do I.

The text for the course is "Like a Splinter in Your Mind: The Philosophy Behind the Matrix Trilogy", by Matt Lawrence...although the course will not only discuss the Matrix trilogy.

class starts tomorrow at 9:30 am....this should be fun...

just thought I would share...

it's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
intell

  

Reply with quote


Another Smith poster!
Posts: 2640
Location: Unplugged and moving forward
View user's profile

You will be sharing with us what they're actually saying in there, right?

I am the new gardener

Click and double-click to resize image
psikeyhackr

  

Reply with quote


So many posts, I must be correct!
Posts: 410
Location: North Eastern Ontario
View user's profile

How many credit hours do we get for giving you ideas for your essays? Whitelaugh Whitelaugh

Kill an economist for Karl
allone

  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

i can/will totally share topics brought up in clas.

in fact i was thinking about taking topics from class and starting new threads with them.

from the flyer that was posted around campus this course looks to be very interesting. here is a quote from my schools website:

Stephen F. Austin State University wrote:

A message to all philosophy minors, science fiction fans, fans of _The Matrix_, science majors, and many others.

When was the last time that you had fun in a class?

Don't miss this rare opportunity to take 'Philosophy in Science Fiction' (PHI-390). In this course we will examine fascinating questions such as: 1) Will computers ever think like people?; 2) How do I know what is real?; 3) Is it possible to travel through time?; and 4) What will humanity become in the future?

No prereqs!

Enrollment is limited and time is running out!

This course will not be taught again for some time.

So, don't miss out! Enroll today!


first day is tomorrow, but i assume nothing much will be discussed besides what to expect from the class, office hours of the instructor, blah blah blah...either way, im pretty pumped to be in a course like this, and with fellow fans...who knows, maybe there will be some hot chicks?

but, of course, i will be sharing class material...

Neo1

  

Reply with quote


Spent much time here, parents wondering
Posts: 1129
Location: The Matrix
View user's profile

nice to hear allone. Smile

"Too know the truth, you must first look past the lie."
allone

  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

psikeyhackr wrote:

How many credit hours do we get for giving you ideas for your essays? Whitelaugh Whitelaugh


i dont know if i can offer any credit hours, but i can give credit where credit is due...if i were to write a paper and quote a fellow member of MeX, you will be given credit

i can see it now:

"um, allone, you cited a person by the name of psikeyhackr, can you explain that please?"

"well, thats his ZION name, DUH!"

Whitelaugh

psikeyhackr

  

Reply with quote


So many posts, I must be correct!
Posts: 410
Location: North Eastern Ontario
View user's profile

Quote:


"um, allone, you cited a person by the name of psikeyhackr, can you explain that please?"

"well, thats his ZION name, DUH!"


Whitelaugh Whitelaugh Whitelaugh Whitelaugh

ps - There's a smilie limit? What kind of cheap website is this?

allone

  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

today we talked about "what is philosophy" and then we were introduced to the allegory of the cave...and got to watch a clip from the matrix.

needless to say i was rather bored.

i didnt speak up in class as to give a chance to the other students to respond...and i dont want to seem like some type of snob know it all or whatever...they didnt talk much.

anyway, nothing really new here at all, the cave allegory has been discussed here before and any fan knows the reference, so yeah...nothing really exciting to report yet.

there are four other books required for the class. i will post what they are, just in case anyone is interested, later on today.

psikeyhackr

Mind Reader  

Reply with quote


So many posts, I must be correct!
Posts: 410
Location: North Eastern Ontario
View user's profile

I was debating how long to wait to ask you about other books in the class. I intended to wait 'til monday.

What clip did they show?


psik

allone

  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

the clip shown was when Neo first meets Morpheus in person and then takes the red pill, we watched until Neo was picked up after being released from his pod.

i feel that maybe we should have kept going, since in the allegory of the cave there is a comment about a persons eyes when they see the real world...and in the matrix Neo asks why his eyes hurt...to which Morpheus tells him, "you've never used them before", but that is just me

allone

  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

ok, here are the other four books for this class:

How to Get the Most Out of Philosophy by Douglas J. Soccio

Philosophy: An Introduction Through Original Fiction by Thomas D Davis

Philosophy and Science Fiction by Michael Philips (Editor)

Philosophers Explore The Matrix by Christopher Grau

i havent had a chance to get any of them yet, since there are only 3 bookstores here in this town, and none of them have any of these in stock...actually only one of the bookstores even has them listed for the class, the other two can order them for me, but it would be a special order, and the last one will get some more in on monday...so i will be getting them monday, i hope...

psikeyhackr

I'm cheap, I'm cheap. You know it. I'm, cheap  

Reply with quote


So many posts, I must be correct!
Posts: 410
Location: North Eastern Ontario
View user's profile

amazon.com...

amazon.com...

amazon.com...

amazon.com...

Quote:

Philosophers Need Something Else

Michael Philips, ed. Philosophy and Science Fiction. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1984. viii+392pp. $12.95

Even the most tradition-oriented philosophers are coming to see that SF contains a wealth of material which exemplifies important philosophical issues and highlights their problems. Moreover, philosophers' own examples are frequently so dull or so abstract as to lead to stupefaction. It is not surprising, then, that some of us are turning to SF as an aid in introducing students to philosophy.

Philips has assembled 17 SF selections, which he divides into six units. Not all of them are independent stories, there is a long excerpt from Lem's Solaris. The unit titles give a fairly good idea of the thrust of the book: "Part 1: Knowledge and the Meaning of Life," "Part 2: Trips through Time and Logical Space:' "Part 3: The Elusive Self," "Part 4: Persona, Minds, and the Essentially Human," "Part 5: Moral Dilemmas," "Part 6: Technology and Human Self-Trans- formation." Each unit contains two or more selections preceded by an Introduction and followed by Study Questions. The editor has shown a commendable open-mindedness in including philosophical material from cultural "hermaneutics," as it is consistently (mis)spelled, as well as the analytic tradition.

His introduction to the book and his unit Introductions are competent but so compressed as to require a lot of explanation and amplification for beginning philosophy students. This at least has the merit of making teachers appear useful. The Study Questions are narrowly focused. Each is concerned with just one selection. No attempt is made to deal with the interrelations of the various issues raised, so here is something else for teachers to do. The disadvantage of this approach is that the students don't have much philosophical reading material to examine. Even if we grant that philosophy is an activity, it is still important to look at examples of that activity.

As for the SF, Philips has come up with a very good group of readings. It is always possible to quarrel with an editor's selections, but particularly in cases like this it may be impossible for the editor to get the rights to his or her first choices. Be that as it may, Philips offers material which is both readable and relevant to his purposes.

Only about ten per cent of the material in this book is primarily philosophical--not enough to make it suitable as the primary text in an introductory course. It could be used as a supplement, but why not use a cheaper mass-market paperback instead? Not all the material in such books would lend itself to philosophical treatment, but a trip to any bookstore with a fair-sized SF section would certainly produce several candidates with enough to be useful. And for those who are set on an integrated approach, there is always Miller and Smith's Thought Probes, which is pretty good despite its flaws.

--William M. Schuyler, Jr. University of Louisville


3 of the books are listed with Amazon as available used at significantly lower prices but the Matrix book wasn't. The cost of shipping could be a question.

The philosophy and sci-fi book looks a little dated but that might not be a serious problem considering how old many philosophical ideas are. It might not have NEUROMANCER though which could bring in Matrix ideas.


psikey

Neo1

  

Reply with quote


Spent much time here, parents wondering
Posts: 1129
Location: The Matrix
View user's profile

thankyou allone, i am a big fan of reading all thing philosophy, so these books should be a delectiable treat for my mind.

thankyou Whitelaugh Thumbup

allone

  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

*sigh* here we are some three weeks into the course and still nothing really to report...i have missed two classes already, one was my birthday (cut me some slack) and this past Tuesday i was sick...yes, i have a doctor's note Razz

we have read chapter 7 out of the Davis book, Appearance and Reality and chapter 14:Plato's Cave and The Matrix from the Grau book...along with numerous handouts that he provides us with.

been talking more about Plato's cave, reality, the two world assumption, and Thursday we started talked about Descartes cogito.

he pretty much told us, and i am seeing it, that he has to cover a lot of basics before we can really move into the good stuff...for those that have never taken any type of philosophy course before...(which i havent, but from all the reading i have done here and a ton of other places i feel like i have) so we are pretty much right now in an intro type period.

anyway, next week we will get into chapters 12:Artificial Ethics, 3:Morpheus and Berkeley on Reality, 4:What's So Bad about Living in the Matrix, and 5:The Matrix of Dreams from the Grau book.

i havent started looking at these yet as a friend went into the hospital last night, but just from the titles they look to be some good class discussions...

-no cute girls

-one guy really gets on my nerves

-prof likes to go off on tangents, but its interesting just to listen to him speak

allone

  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

Neo1 wrote:

thankyou allone, i am a big fan of reading all thing philosophy, so these books should be a delectiable treat for my mind.

thankyou Whitelaugh Thumbup


no problem, so far they seem to be pretty cool. i have only read some of the Lawrence, Grau and Davis books though...

and i cant find it or remember which book it was in (either Davis or Grau...im thinking it was Davis) but one passage got on my nerves...it said something to the effect of, "should we not trust the Oracle, she did after all lie to Neo and tell him he's not the one"...grr, NO she didnt! (there are several threads here asking about this)

anyway, i want to ask my prof about it and what he thinks...but havent had a chance to. our class discussions havent really allowed for that question or comment yet.

psikeyhackr

Choice?  

Reply with quote


So many posts, I must be correct!
Posts: 410
Location: North Eastern Ontario
View user's profile

allone wrote:

"should we not trust the Oracle, she did after all lie to Neo and tell him he's not the one"...grr, NO she didnt!


She told him he had "the Gift" but that he was "waiting for something." At that moment in her kitchen he wasn't THE ONE because he hadn't made the choice yet.

Is that what she meant? He didn't know himself yet.


psikey

allone

Re: Choice?  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

psikeyhackr wrote:

allone wrote:

"should we not trust the Oracle, she did after all lie to Neo and tell him he's not the one"...grr, NO she didnt!


She told him he had "the Gift" but that he was "waiting for something." At that moment in her kitchen he wasn't THE ONE because he hadn't made the choice yet.

Is that what she meant? He didn't know himself yet.


psikey


well, pretty much...she also said, "looks like you're waiting for something"..."what?"..."who knows, your next life maybe?"

and it was in his "next life" (after he was shot, died, came back) that he was the one.

had she told him, "yes, youre the one" then and there instead of what she did tell him, "youre not the one, you have to make a choice: your life or Morpheus'" then he may not have gone in to save Morpheus. she told him "exactly what he needed to hear" its because he didnt think that hes the one that he went in to save Morpheus. which led to him becoming the one...("there's a difference between knowing the path and walking the path")

max314

  

Reply with quote


More posts than Smiths
Posts: 828
Location: London, England
View user's profile

allone wrote:

-no cute girls


No distractions.

allone wrote:

-one guy really gets on my nerves


Good. Then that's one less person you have to worry about making small-talk with.

allone wrote:

-prof likes to go off on tangents, but its interesting just to listen to him speak


Nothing is worse than having a professor teaching something your fascinated with who sticks to the syllabus like a machine. Scribble notes when you hear something interesting (book references, ideas, etc) and let yourself flow with the professor's energy. Makes for good self-directed study.

Sorry, I know I sound like an anti-social little fuck, but it's only because I'm currently doing a course that I'm not 100% passionate about, have been getting involved with the plethora of hot gals on my course, and have lecturers who sound less interesting than the gentle hum of a microwave. I'm envious of what you have and I hope you'll enjoy some for me Wink

MAX

"If it can be written, or thought...it can be filmed." ~ Stanley Kubrick
max314

  

Reply with quote


More posts than Smiths
Posts: 828
Location: London, England
View user's profile

allone wrote:

and i cant find it or remember which book it was in (either Davis or Grau...im thinking it was Davis) but one passage got on my nerves...it said something to the effect of, "should we not trust the Oracle, she did after all lie to Neo and tell him he's not the one"...grr, NO she didnt! (there are several threads here asking about this)


Yeah, the Oracle never actually says that Neo is not the One. She tells him that he already knows (i.e. she shows him the door) and he says that "I'm not the One" (i.e. he hasn't walked through it), to which she responds "sorry, kiddo - you've got the gift, but it looks like you're waiting for something".

In actuality, she is telling him that he is the One ("you've got the gift") but that it is lying dormant within him. It isn't until Neo is about to go in and save Morpheus that he shows you how he interpreted the Oracle's statement: "I'm not the One, Trinity - the Oracle hit me with that, too".

So, you're right, the Oracle never lied to Neo. But it goes to show that there are philosophers so anxious to capitalise on the philosophical bedstone that is The Matrix that they will jump onto the bandwagon without carefully analysing the film first.

I'd also be interested to know how far your class discussions go into Reloaded and Revolutions since most philosphers seem to dismiss their philosophical issues for some reason.

psikeyhackr

Words control reality. NOT!  

Reply with quote


So many posts, I must be correct!
Posts: 410
Location: North Eastern Ontario
View user's profile

Quote:

most philosphers seem to dismiss their philosophical issues for some reason.


Philosophers are people with degrees in philosophy, they don't necessarily have any brains. The same applies to people with degrees in computer science. It is amazing how many "computer scientists" don't understand electricity. How can you understand the functionings of an electronic device with no understanding of electricity?

This society teaches people to think wih words and promotes the paradigm that the words either are, or control reality. Words affect how people think, reality doesn't give a damn about them. Europe is a continent. YEAH RIGHT!

How much of our UNreal social matrix is created by words?


psikey

max314

Re: Words control reality. NOT!  

Reply with quote


More posts than Smiths
Posts: 828
Location: London, England
View user's profile

psikeyhackr wrote:

Quote:

most philosphers seem to dismiss their philosophical issues for some reason.


Philosophers are people with degrees in philosophy, they don't necessarily have any brains. The same applies to people with degrees in computer science. It is amazing how many "computer scientists" don't understand electricity. How can you understand the functionings of an electronic device with no understanding of electricity?

This society teaches people to think wih words and promotes the paradigm that the words either are, or control reality. Words affect how people think, reality doesn't give a damn about them.


psikey


You're damn right.

Just because you have learned the current theory (and it is only a theory) on atomic structure in a chemistry class, that doesn't mean that you are able to construct a new theory on atomic structure.

Similarly, just because you know how to write about the works of philosophers gone by, that doesn't mean that you are able to necessarily construct your own philosophies or can think outside the already-constructed box.

Frankly, a philosophy enthusiast such as myself has as much chance of spotting philosophical parallels in the movies as a qualified philosopher.

What's interesting is that the philosophers on the 'Roots Of The Matrix' DVD in The Ultimate Matrix Collection seem to run out of things to say about the movies as they go on, when there is in fact so much more to say in either Reloaded or Revolutions on their own than the first movie.

This is most probably because it has been over half a decade since The Matrix started to be digested by philosophers around the world, and the relative lack of popularity of Reloaded and Revolutions have caused many philosophers to assume that it is nothing to worry about...which is handy because it allows them to cover up the fact that they can't perceive the depths of the films.

intell

  

Reply with quote


Another Smith poster!
Posts: 2640
Location: Unplugged and moving forward
View user's profile

Quote:

Similarly, just because you know how to write about the works of philosophers gone by, that doesn't mean that you are able to necessarily construct your own philosophies or can think outside the already-constructed box.

Frankly, a philosophy enthusiast such as myself has as much chance of spotting philosophical parallels in the movies as a qualified philosopher.

What's interesting is that the philosophers on the 'Roots Of The Matrix' DVD in The Ultimate Matrix Collection seem to run out of things to say about the movies as they go on, when there is in fact so much more to say in either Reloaded or Revolutions on their own than the first movie.

This is most probably because it has been over half a decade since The Matrix started to be digested by philosophers around the world, and the relative lack of popularity of Reloaded and Revolutions have caused many philosophers to assume that it is nothing to worry about...which is handy because it allows them to cover up the fact that they can't perceive the depths of the films.


Now its my turn to say, "you're d*** right!"

allone

  

Reply with quote


Power Poster
Posts: 376
Location: Texas
View user's profile

i second that, to both psikey and max.

i hate to say it, max, but i recall my prof saying once something like, "the matrix is probably the best movie ever made, the first one atleast" as he made a certain face that gave me the impression that he did not like them...

my friend in the class who sits next to me looked up at him and under his breath said, uh oh...and then to me waiting for me to say something...all i could do was drop my jaw, i couldnt understand how he could say that...(it is an opinion after all and he is entitled to it...but if his reasonings for liking M1 are what they are, then how could he not like the rest?)

anyway, class is tomorrow, i will write more...if there is anything worth repeating

Reply to topic



Right now you are in a Matrix forum called
"Matrix Chit Chat & Fun"
Page 1 of 1

Click here to see all topics of this forum
Click here to see all other Matrix forums hosted by matrix-explained.com

 


Click here for more options
V
V

Search

View unanswered posts

Log in to check your private messages

Click here to see, who is online

Most users ever online was 443 on 06.Nov.2003 10:03

Submit your site!

Go voting!

Edit your data

Jump to:  
Memberlist
Usergroups
FAQ
The time now is 25.May.2012 20:24
All times are GMT + 2 Hours

Powered by p h p B.B. © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group