|
[Matrix Reloaded] Merovingian (about Neo stopping the bullets): "Okay, you have some skill. Kill him."
|
|
|
|
NEOminous
|
|
Free Your Biased Opinion… M3 Was Bad.
|
|
|
Bleeding newbie poster
Posts: 5
|
IMO, The Matrix was the greatest movie ever. Reloaded although it wasn’t perfect, it was a good sequel that brought up some serious thought provoking questions. After Reloaded I spent 6 months of restless nights researching the Internet for matrix related documents, studying the religious overtones such as Buddhism and Gnosticism. Also studying all types of philosophy, mythology, mathematics, and basically everything that Reloaded brought to the table. I learned a lot and somewhat felt like I matured after Reloaded (and I am grateful). And for some, Reloaded raised Revolutions’ expectations to another level and all serious matrix fans waited for Revolutions as if we were waiting for an appearance from God himself.
This is hard for me to write this but this is just how I honestly feel. With the exception of it action scenes, Revolutions was basically a horrible movie from beginning to end and by all means no way to conclude any trilogy (I’ve explained my reasons why in other forums). When I first saw Revolutions I told everyone how much I loved it, but deep down inside I knew it was bad. I used to make up excuses for things that happened in Rev and said that it couldn’t have been any other way. But then I realized that I became a slave to my own favoritism.
All I’m saying to hardcore fanboys is don’t be a victim to your own bias opinions. One thing I’ve learned from the matrix was to see beyond the control. Be your own person, question things and don’t accept something just because it is. Just because it’s a matrix product doesn’t mean that it’s always gonna be greatest thing on the planet. I know everyone is entitled to there own opinions but when people embrace something that is so blatantly disappointing it reminds me of… “People that are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inert, so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it”. Get my point?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom
|
|

150+ posts
Posts: 154
Location: Sacramento CA
|
Revolutions was just as bad as the first two were awesome!
You hit the nail on the head.
There are two many things for me to list as to why it was horrible, but here are my main problems with it:
1. The first two movies set me up to the thinking that Neo could do anything he set his mind to, but he let the Trainman beat him with one punch and basically was a looser the whole movie.
2. The Machines are still in control. At anytime they can change their mind and return to thier good ole days. They have their Master Operating System that everyone calls the "Machine God", (how could he be that when he could not defeat Smith), and the humans are left with a few sniviling weaklings.
3. After 5 times of killing hundreds of thousands, make that 6 times, the machine leader gets off scott free. Where is the justice in that?
4. Humans are still batteries/slaves. Maybe they are willing slaves, but seems to me the W-bros are acting like bigots that are saying that slavery in the South was OK for those who wanted it.
By-the-way the "Source" that the W-bros were talking about in the movie must have meant the same as the "heart" of the Machine world and was not really referring to the "Source Code."
To be technically correct, the source code is dormant algorithims and uncompiled language that has no control of a computer or other programs. It is the Operating System that is the true Master or Manager of other programs and dictates what other "machines" or periphials that those programs can use. I knew that much before I got my B.S. degree in computers / Information Technology. The CPU is also really a dumb chip, whose job is to do two things, Fetch an instruction and execute it!
It is the O.S. that is the Brains of a Computer system. It is the O.S. that became self-aware and then commanded the Architect to design other programs including the VR program called the Matrix. At least that is what would be technically correct.
If that isn't the way it was intended in the movie, then that is yet another flaw!
The "Source".... I sure hope the W-bros meant the "heart" of Machine city when they used the word source and I hope they didn't mean "Source-Code" because I am already so disappointed.
|
|
Freedom vs Slavery - Governments take from those who earn it and give it to those who haven't.
|
|
|
|
Raksasha69
|
|
Even people who like it agree that the matrix 3 sucks.
|
|
|

So many posts, I must be correct!
Posts: 418
|
What? you say? doesnt make sence?
read my previous post. i dont want to explain why the third matrix movie sucks.
If people who even liked the film agree with things that are clearly stupid about the movie and still like it.
Somethings definately wrong with that.
One could argue that the rest of the movie makes up for the stupid things in it right?
Wrong.
The reason why i liked the first 2 movies is because it had very little things that were bad in the movie.
Granted, the first 2 movies arent perfect either.
(using a computer generated charachter in bullet time is just a really bad idea)
(having that rave scene that just didnt need to be there "even if to show the symbolism of unity between the people of zion." still could have done without)
and there are many others.
The first 2 movies have things that are new and no one has really seen in movies before.
-an example (jurassic park dinosaurs) in the first jurassic park everyone was stunned at how realistic they looked, which is why everyone loved the first one and didnt really care for the 2 sequals. (look at how much money they made if you dont believe me)
And as for how much money the 3rd matrix movie made?
Holy crap.
If you want to judge how good a movie was based on how much money they made at the box office?
(which is a pretty good depiction BTW- and most people do)
Look at how much money the 3rd film LOST.
Yes thats right. LOST.
I could go all day showing the opinions and the Facts (I.e. the money it made) on why the movie is a heaping pile of dung.
The only REAL reason why people like the 3rd movie is because it is THE MATRIX. It is the same reason why most people like star wars episode 1 even though they know deep down it wasnt a very good film.
Because it was Star Wars.
Some people just refuse to accept the fact that something so great could have anything to do with something so bad.
How do i know this?
Because im one of them.
Ive seen the film multiple times (for free btw) just to get a handle on it, maybe to see something in it that would tell me that it really doesnt suck so bad.
Guess what. It does. And im sad.
Some people like the fact that you dont know what is going on, and its up to us to figure out our own depiction of the meaning.
These people are wrong because the W brothers have a message to send out.
(how do i know?)
Watch the matrix revisted.
Laurence fishburne, Carrie anne moss, and even Neo himself all said that the movies are sending a "message" there is a purpose.
It is clear that the movies are saying something.
It sends the message that you can control (someone else's) choice and there is nothing that the other person can do.
If it is your destiny to go out and be the next hitler because your father beat you, then there is nothing you can do to stop it. It is choice vs enevitability, choice loses.
If you even research the views about the W brothers you will find the truth.
The truth that they believe in Causality.
And there is NOTHING that can be argued against writers INTENT.
What did the writers of the Matrix trilogy INTEND.
Not what people can read into it.
Not what REALLY can happen, or what SHOULD be.
But what message they intended to portray from the movies.
"Youre right smith, you were always right. It was enevitable."
And dont tell me it was the charachter saying it so that he could trick agent smith. (symbolising control his choice) Because everything else in the 3 movies including that statement point the other way.
Just read this post after you read this.
matrix-explained.com...
And to answer the question of why people who hated the 3rd movie are on this forum?
Well duh.
Because, as the first 2 people clearly stated.. CLEARLY that they loved the first 2.
When you become enthralled in the first 2 movies and get so dissapointed about how the 3rd one ended then people naturally like to vent their frustration.
As a matter of fact, if I liked all 3 movies i wouldnt even be posting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom
|
|
The anomaly Said:
|
|
|

150+ posts
Posts: 154
Location: Sacramento CA
|
Quote: | | what i dont understand is why someone would register to a matrix forum and spend thier time posting when they dont even like the film... |
As Raksasha69 said:
Quote: | When you become enthralled in the first 2 movies and get so dissapointed about how the 3rd one ended then people naturally like to vent their frustration.
As a matter of fact, if I liked all 3 movies i wouldnt even be posting. |
And that is exactly how I feel. I loved the first two so much that I need to vent about how bad the third one is, maybe someone will be able to tell the w-bros and then "they" will "get it."
Thanks for listening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raksasha69
|
|
TASTE IS NOT OPINION
|
|
|

So many posts, I must be correct!
Posts: 418
|
They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
While this statment is true people take it too literally.
Everyone can universally agree that (for what is accepted as attractive for that society at the time) Pamela Anderson is attractive. Some may say other people are MORE attractive than she is, but VERY few people will say that she is a pig and her face looks like vomit. *They can say it but they would be lying to themself*
The same thing could be said about taste in movies.
*as freedom linked* shows people who get paid for their opinion. Obviously people that are recieving money for their reviews must mean that their opinion has at least SOME merit.
While i dont agree with every "paid" critic i do agree with the majority of them when i look at the combination.
What im really trying to say is that unlike a societies depiction of beauty, there is a Universally accepted opinion of what is good about movies and what is very bad. (I.e. the acadamy awards *best actor* etc.)
If your opinion of a movie differs than what the MAJORITY of the world then if i were you id reconsider my taste in movies.
While you cant argue feelings *i feel this movie sucked* and you cant argue someones opinion *i still liked it*
What you can argue is TASTE.
Anyone that liked the movie dispite reading the truth in my posts has NO taste.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raksasha69
|
|
John mirra
|
|
|

So many posts, I must be correct!
Posts: 418
|
John mirra
This guy knows what hes talking about.
He likes MAX PAYNE 2 and DISLIKES the 3rd matrix movie.
You have good taste.
You based your name off of MAX PAYNE 2
What a great game
SUPERFUN.
Even the song is good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom
|
|
xtreme_bi0hazard said
|
|
|

150+ posts
Posts: 154
Location: Sacramento CA
|
Well there are some people who actually liked "The giant spider invasion (1975)"
To each his own. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Was it a perfect movie for you? No flaws? Nothing in it you didn't like?
You liked Trinity getting killed?
You liked the machines winning?
The overwhelming consus of the critics didn't like M3 and it actually lost money at the box office.
I wanted to like it really bad, because I loved M1 and M2 more than any two movies I had ever seen, but the w-bros did about everything in their power to screw it up. Or as one critic on a movie critic site....
said....
Quote: | "I'm warning you: don't see this film--because whatever third movie you envisioned in your head, no matter how lame, has got to be better than this."
-- Widgett Walls, NEEDCOFFEE.COM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xtreme_bi0hazard
|
|

Experienced poster
Posts: 118
Location: The Matrix
|
Quote: | Was it a perfect movie for you? No flaws? Nothing in it you didn't like?
You liked Trinity getting killed?
You liked the machines winning? |
No flaws? You gotta be kidding... all movies have their flaws. If i said I liked it doesn't mean its the perfekt movie....
Well then in M2 Trinity almost got killed... she might get shot by the Agent. If she doesn't get shot then she'd probably fall to her death cuz she can't really fly like Neo.
If Trinity doesn't die in the third movie and gets 'brought back from the brink of death' once again I'd be reallly pissed at that. Neo brought her back once, and thats enough... not again =P
The Machines didn't win... no one won... the Machines could've won but then Neo did his thing and they had this peace am I not right? So to me no one really won.
Quote: | "I'm warning you: don't see this film--because whatever third movie you envisioned in your head, no matter how lame, has got to be better than this."
-- Widgett Walls, NEEDCOFFEE.COM |
That is the lamest comment made by a movie critic I've ever heard.[/quote]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom
|
|
At what price peace?
|
|
|

150+ posts
Posts: 154
Location: Sacramento CA
|
So to those black people in the South who liked being a slave made it O.K. to perpetuate that fraud under the guise of choice, (it being their choice?)
Slavery is wrong period. Even if some choose it.
The mcahines will surely be faced with a problem. As more and more pod people choose freedom, more and more machines must be deleted or die. At what point will the machines say...."enough?"
What if the old 80 - 20 rule comes into play, and 80 percent of the pod people want to be free? Will the machines still allow it? Don't they have the "hammer" or power to decide man's fate?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click here for more options V V
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by p h p B.B. © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|