»Causality«

Well I don't care really very much about the hidden meanings in Matrix, My own idea, but it's just my personal opinion ( and what is more absolute and at the same time more relative then ones ideas?), is that there is a big message that underlies the whole film, but probably it is too wide to be seen, I mean that sometimes we see the trees but we don't see the forest that there's around us. I think that this message is connected with Shopenhuer ( I don't think this is the right spelling of this name) and Nietzesche philosophy....to the Maya veil and the will of power, we have to find a meaning, we are programmed in this way....in order to find a cause and an aim....but what if everything is a grand illusion...beginning from our consiousness....what if causality is only an illusion....but who care about that...we are sense makers...and nothing else so we can live only by finding a logic and a rationality in the things we see, for we see only what we want to see....and everything is just written....because everything seems to us so causal....action and reaction....but what if everything is just casual ??? at the end there is not a so big difference between causality and casuality there is only an exchange of two letters....if we are looking for a meaning also here!!!!!
Let's accept the challenge...
at the end we're not so different from computers and robots....what we have of different is only the absurd illusion to be different at all and especially free..and conscious.....
Nothing more wrong.....

In the end...
All is vanity...

Noos2 wrote:

but what if everything is a grand illusion...beginning from our consiousness....what if causality is only an illusion....but who care about that...we are sense makers...and nothing else so we can live only by finding a logic and a rationality in the things we see

what sucks, is that we are limited by our sight. maybe it all looks casual, vain, because we don't "see" everything. in the end, everything we discover is limited by our ability to perceive. even the grandest theories of life, psycology, science are limited by the accuracy of our observation. its a basic statement, but worth saying in response to your post. well, i could be the only one who thinks its worth saying, huh?

so it wasn't clear to me, do you lean more toward "everything is causal" or "everything is casual?" i couldn't tell if you were discribing Nietzesche philosophy or actually listing your beliefs.